|
This article originally appeared
in the American Farrier's Journal magazine (Sep/Oct 2005 issue)
and also in the European Farrier's Journal (#115, 2005).
Shoeing Founder with Plastic Shoes
Monique Craig, EponaShoe
For the past five years, I have been applying plastic
shoes to horses.
I also have 'regular' horses in plastic shoes, not just horses with
soundness issues. Over the past four years I've been involved (either
directly or indirectly) with over 35 founder cases which have all
been treated using flexible shoes as this article will discuss.
Why do I choose plastic over metal shoes? Well, the answer is simple:
I want a prosthetic that is friendlier to the hoof's function. Metal
does not flex nor shock absorb nearly as much as the natural hoof.
In other words, the mechanical properties of metals (steel and aluminum)
have little in common with those of hoof keratin (see fig. 1). Let's
make an analogy concerning the relative flexibility of these things:
If hoof keratin is the infield of Yankee stadium, then man-made
flexible synthetics occupy the entire infield and outfield of Yankee
stadium; aluminum is one mile beyond the centerfield fence, and
steel is three miles beyond the centerfield fence! I think that
to protect and support the hoof, we should be using something that's
at least in the ballpark!

Figure 1: Relationship between the hoof, synthetics, aluminum, and
steel. Values for hoof keratin are from [1], and for other materials
from [2]. Click figure for larger version.
The three horses in the case studies presented here
were initially shod with Marathon shoes (from Germany) and now with
the EponaShoe. I generally glue on the shoes rather than nail -
less hoof wall damage, and in some founder cases there is no good
wall to nail to. The glue spreads the load evenly and avoids concentrations
at nail locations. The EponaShoe provides good caudal support which
is important, since in these cases loading of the hoof wall often
needs to be minimized. I have chosen to write about these three
particular horses because of the severity of the founder, and because
I have been able to follow their progress for a minimum of two years.
Two of the three horses ended up being part of our herd here at
EponaTech ranch (now 11 horses total
we hope this will be the
final number!) One of the three horses went back to its home. All
these foundered horses came to me by veterinarian referral, and
none were diagnosed with metabolic problems. I started treatment
on these horses after the acute founder episode.

Figure 2: Horse #1: Hoof health improved over 3.5 months. This horse,
now 21 years old, has now been maintained for the past 4 years on
plastic shoes and happily roams our pastures. Click image for larger
version.
Although the use of plastic shoes is beneficial to
the hoof, it is NOT a miracle cure to founder or any other serious
hoof-related problems. To me, the plastic shoe is a means to an
end -- its use enables me to eliminate some mechanical constraints
placed on the hoof by the application of metal shoes. The key to
any shoeing 'success' rests in enabling proper function of internal
hoof structures, trimming for a specific situation, and using appropriate
shoe placement.

Figure 3: Horse #2: Hoof health improved over 5.5 months. This horse,
now seven years old, has been on plastic shoes for over three years.
Click image for larger version.
Using plastic shoes, the added flex to the hoof capsule
helps circulation which in turn simulates new growth. I have data
on over 400 horses in plastic shoes -- the common denominator with
all of them is improved horn quality and healthier horn growth.
Trimming the hoof to help attain better joint alignment and giving
arch and sole support will also contribute to improved circulation.
Under the right conditions, the hoof capsule can restructure itself
very quickly. I must point out that some images of hoof resections
I see in professional (farrier and veterinarian) magazines have
me somewhat concerned - Is it truly necessary to resect hoof walls?
Hoof wall resection is perhaps more often appropriate when using
a metal shoe. With plastic shoes, it may not be done as routinely.
I think that before doing radical horn removal, one should ask "is
there really necrotic tissue that cannot be resolved by the animal
'on its own'?" The exact mechanism under which a hoof is able
to restructure itself is poorly understood at this stage but suffice
to say that the hoof is amazing in its capability to regenerate
itself when allowed to do so (see figures 2 and 3). The old-fashioned
notion that the wall grows down from the corium seems not to be
strictly true: there is some amount of new wall growth from within
the hoof capsule [3].
Deep resection can cause permanent change to molecular structure
of the hoof keratin [4], this means that the biochemical and biomechanical
stability of the horn may become compromised. I suspect that any
long term aggressive trimming of the horn will eventually cause
loss of its mechanical integrity.
It is also crucial to understand the mechanical properties of tendons
and ligaments, especially how they react after immobilization. Tendons
and ligaments will lose their flexibility if not put to work (see
figure 4.) It is harder to 'de-rotate' the pedal bone of a foundered
horse that does not get sufficient exercise. The tendons/ligaments
tend to return to their atrophied state. In the case of tendons,
the muscles to which they attach are the real issue - it is these
muscles that need to stretch and come back to some normalcy. It
has been shown in rehabilitative human medicine, that after a tendon/ligament
has been immobilized, the time required to go back to its original
elasticity is three times the length of time it was immobilized
[5]. The foundered horse needs to be made as comfortable as soon
as possible in order for the horse to resume 'reasonably normal'
motion and exercise. It greatly helps the tendons and ligaments
regain their flexibility.

Figure 4. Horse #2: At the beginning of treatment (A), the angle
was 14.4 degrees. This was reduced (B) to 8.1 degrees. Then, without
proper follow-up and lack of motion (C), the angle again worsened
to 12.6 degrees. Finally, under treatment again (D), the angle
was lowered to 6.8 degrees. Today, this horse is being maintained
at an angle of about 5.5 degrees, and has been started under saddle
in 2004. Click image for larger version.
I think that people misuse the term 'chronic founder'.
To me, a chronic founder is a horse that continues to have laminitic
episodes due to undiagnosed metabolic problems. Sometimes horses
are called chronic because they have not been treated properly
and keep returning to their old founder stance due to the lack
of movement. We need to distinguish between metabolic issues and
mechanical problems.
Figure 5: Horse #3: Before (left hand side) and after (right hand
side) radiographs and photographs as a severe founder is treated
with plastic shoes. This horse, today still only four years old,
has a lot of residual damage from the founder episode, but has
been comfortable in plastic. Click image for larger version.
Whereas many veterinary and farriery books present
the 'correct' joint alignment for the last three phalanges as
a straight line, I have never felt this is quite right. The bones
P3 (coffin joint), P2 (short pastern), and P1 (long pastern) are
weight-bearing, and should align so that each bone is slightly
more inclined than the previous as we move up the leg. That is,
there should be a small rotation angle between phalanges, each
a bit more up-right as we move up the phalanges [6]. I use software
that I have developed, called Metron-PX, to assess the position
of P3 within the hoof capsule and the alignment of the phalanges.
A discussion of the Metron software is beyond the scope of this
article, but there is a lot of information at the EponaTech web-site
[7].
In many founder cases (including the three covered
in this article) there has been a substantial rotation of the
P3 bone. In such cases, a primary aim of my approach is, over
time, to lower the heel to attempt to restore the angle of the
P3 bone relative to ground. This process involves removing heel
gradually, which is the opposite of some approaches that recommend
the use of wedge pads to "relieve stress on the deep digital
flexor tendon (DDFT)". However, I feel that eventually we
need to restore a more normal stance and we need to work against
the tendency to atrophy. I also feel that with the heels elevated,
a concentrated loading towards the toe occurs, which may contribute
to the decalcification at the tip of P3 that occurs in some cases.
I try to bevel the shoe at the toe, and place the shoe on the
foot so as to minimize the 'lever arm', and reduce DDFT forces
in this way (see fig. 5). Most importantly, using my "method"
in conjunction with the plastic shoe and packing, the horses have
been almost immediately comfortable. It takes some attention to
detail to change hoof angle by reasonable amounts over time for
the process to succeed.
It is often the case that foundered horses kept
on artificial high heels will eventually have to have tendon/ligament
surgery to correct this problem. In human medicine, it is known
that surgery to tendons and ligaments often has a side effect
of irreversible damage to proprioceptors [5, page 310] among other
things. I believe the same is true for the horse, and so in my
opinion, such tendon and ligament surgery should only be used
as an absolute "last resort".

Figure 6: A two-part silicon-based packing is used to help evenly
load the foot. Click image for larger version.
Finally, I pack the bottom part of the hoof to allow
the hoof to load evenly
(figure 6). The main complaint sometimes heard about packing is
that it can make horses sore. I think that it is true if people
are not careful. Excessive sole removal - meaning creating a big
cup in the sole and then placing too much packing can make the
horse very sore. Preparing the sole carefully with only minor
clean-up if needed, followed by selective use of packing and placement
of packing almost always succeeds. Also, there are many possibilities
in pedal bones shapes. This requires some thinking prior to packing.
It is important to choose the right material or materials to place
under the sole. In difficult cases I deal with problems like this
by packing in multiple layers of material. A layer of foam under
the pedal bone does wonders in sore toe areas or when P3 has gone
through the sole. In cases like these I use a thicker layer of
glue to lift the shoe off the sole. A judicious use of the glue
will often allow you to work around hoof problems, such as abscesses.
You can choose to not apply glue in some areas.
Conclusions
Due to the many variations and special situations
that arise in the treatment of founder cases, I think it is unwise
to promote a strict "method" to be followed. But adherence
to some of the basic principles discussed in this article, in
particular the use of a flexible shoe and a good means of frog/sole
support, can help you achieve beneficial results. There are many
other important aspects to trimming and shoeing which could not
be covered in this article.
In summary, flexible shoes make sense in treating founder cases
for the following reasons:
*They shock absorb and make the horse more comfortable.
*A more comfortable horse moves more, and this is beneficial in
not allowing the tendons and muscles to atrophy further, and to
start rehabilitation.
*The plastic wears easier than metal, so the horse (or you) can
adjust the various bevels (at the toe and also lateral-medial
sides) as needed.
*The shoe does not inhibit flexing of the hoof, and so aids in
normal hoof function to pump blood, bringing nutrients to help
rebuild damaged walls. Reduces the need for resection.
*Since they are softer than any metal shoe, there is less chance
of causing a hard pressure point to any region of the sole.
References
[1] Bertram, J. and Gosselin J., "Functional
Design of Horse Hoof Keratin: The Modulation of Mechanical Properties
through Hydration Effects", Journal of Experimental Biology
130, 121-136, 1987.
[2] Van Vlack, L., "Material Science for Engineers",
Addison-Wesley, 1970.
[3] Bowker, R., "The Growth and Adaptive Capabilities
of the Hoof Wall and Sole: Functional Changes in Response to Stress",
in the proceedings of the 49th Annual Convention of the American
Association of Equine Practitioners, New Orleans, 2003.
[4] Cope, B., Hopegood, L. et al, "Studies
of Equid Hoof Horn Material by EPR Spectroscopy", in Journal
of Materials Chemistry, 8(1), 43-45, 1998.
[5] Martin, R.B. et al, "Skeletal Tissue Mechanics",
Springer Verlag, New York, 1998.
[6] Craig, J. and Craig, M., "Measuring the
Hoof", a presentation at the 2nd International Hoof Care
Summit, Cincinnati, Ohio, January, 2005.
[7] www.eponatech.com
Monique Craig is a hoof researcher,
farrier, consultant to farriers, rider, trainer, and founder of
EponaTech (www.EponaTech.com)
and EponaShoe (www.EponaShoe.com).
|